Maybe he had the selling dealer remove the soft top and frame. I really don't think there would have been an easy way to have the factory
not install the convertible top.
He also shows:
-Traction Control (Sport Mode, Touring Mode, Performance Mode)
The car has the FX3 console switch (the Touring, Sport, Performance modes) but the front shocks that you can see in the engine pics are not FX3 shocks. There are no actuators in the pic and they don't appear to have the gears on the top of the shock rod.
With the hardtop on the car and the soft top folded down, there is a lot less room in the rear storage area so maybe the original owner (and he says he does not know the original owner in the email replies) wanted a way to increase storage space. But without the 'vert top, you would not want to get caught driving without the hardtop if it started to rain
The hardtops were not installed at the factory. When a car was ordered with RPO CC2, the car was completed and sent to American Sunroof Company a couple miles down the street from the BG plant. The tops were installed there and the workers aligned the door glass to fit properly for both the hardtop and softtop. Then the car was returned to the plant for eventual shipping.
THe seller mentions that 6 injectors were replaced. A good shop would have replaced all 8 as a set. If the car sat for a log time, there could hve been some injectors clogged up if the gas went bad, but the fuel filter should have been replaced at the same time. Doing a "fuel system flush" sounds a bit strange.
But 52K miles for a 92 is not a bad car to think about. When I solld my 92 vert last year (it had the same options including the hardop) with 41K miles on it, I got 17K for it. I had AFS chrome ZR-1 style wheels, a B&B exhaust, and it was Polo Green with tan interior.
Anyone notice the VIN production number?? 532 is a very early 92!
