I've read _a lot_ of differing opinions about descreening the MAF, and I have yet to see anything resembling a consenus on the matter. It looks to me like half the folks claim it hurts performance and causes rough idles and other drivability problems. The other half claims it helps a little.
My own theory is that the MAF is a sensor device which is calibrated to operate correctly with the screens in place. Altering it necessarily changes the accuracy of its readings. Think about it... it has to. You're changing the way the air flows over the wire. Depending on the car, this slight shift in reading accuracy may cause rough idles, lose performance, do nothing, or might even make the car run a little better (on top of the slightly increased air flow). I believe this is the primary reason why different people get different results out of this alteration.
Unless you're a betting man, I wouldn't mess with the MAF without also applying a custom programming to the car. Such programming would cover new calibration for the MAF readings in its altered state.
Just to apply another data point to this theory, Hypertech recommends their power programs for use with 160 degree thermostats, sport exhaust, and sport intakes. But they very specifically say _not_ to use their power programs with altered MAF sensors. They make a special note of it. Clearly, they believe that there is an issue with altered MAFs which affects performance tuning... and its not the increased air flow, or they wouldn't be recommending the improved intakes.
Just some thoughts... I don't know the answer for sure. But I suspect I'm not far off.
- Skant