Finally found it. Important document

[wallyknoch]

I have been looking for this for years, afraid that it was lost forever. I suspected that it was in my law school notes all along and last week I went through a huge box of old legal pads and notes and low and behold, I found my original dealers window sticker. It`s all there, just the way I ordered it and is a true copy. Dumas Milner Chevrolet, Miami Florida. That should make old 107512 worth a few more bucks!
This is the reading of the options
900 SOLID BLACK 00.00
STD BLACK TRIM 00.00
STD CONVERT TOP BLACK 00.00
685B 4 SPEED TRANSMISSION 188.30
102B SIGNAL SEEK RADIO 137.75
1832A 670X15 4 PLY WSW 31.55
441A OFF ROAD EXHAUST EQ 00.00
582A 360 HP CORVETTE V 8 484.20
419A AUXILIARY TOP EQUIP 236.75
675H POSITRACTION AXLE 43.05
686D METALLIC BRAKE 37.70
PERM ANTI FREEZE 5.00

 

[67HEAVEN]

Gee, Wally, how come you didn't order an L-88 in this one? :eyerole

 

[wallyknoch]

It wasn`t available yet or I would have. Step up an I`ll buy you a drink 67 , thanks :bar

 

[00fxd]

How cool is that, a one owner '62 with good options and all the paperwork!

 

[SharkInShark]

I found my original dealers window sticker. It`s all there, just the way I ordered it and is a true copy.

An "orignial" rather than a "duplicate" or "true copy" under the Best Evidence Rule, FRE 1101, correct?

(Sorry, couldn't resist )

 

[Sting Ray]

Wow,


Congrats on the find!

Tom

 

[wallyknoch]

Re: Re: Finally found it. Important document

An "orignial" rather than a "duplicate" or "true copy" under the Best Evidence Rule, FRE 1101, correct?

(Sorry, couldn't resist )

I don`t mind. But Cal has a secondary evidence rule in assisting the best evidence rule, correct? Isn`t the best evidence rule included in FRE 1001, how would FRE 1101 apply? Oh, by the way I have the original, but can only forward a copy! . just foolin Shark. ! thanks, wally