Tentative GM-UAW contract reflects promised new culture
Maybe the promised New Detroit is for real.
In the run-up to this fall's national contract bargaining, United Auto Workers President Bob King and his counterparts at the three automakers vowed to craft deals that would secure jobs for union members, contain fixed costs for the companies and spread a bigger chunk of profits among hourly employees who shared the burden of painful restructuring.
By the preliminary look of the tentative agreement between the UAW and General Motors Co., both sides delivered in negotiations that are remarkable as much for how they've departed from the Old Detroit rite of confrontation and entitlement as they are for the particulars of the UAW-GM deal to be detailed today in Detroit.
Hold the line on base wage increases and pensions? Check. Deliver a $5,000 signing bonus and expand profit sharing to North American performance, enabling UAW members to profit from financial results in Canada and Mexico? Check. Show analysts and investors that the new bosses aren't the same as the old ones, which might explain why GM shares traded 1.95 percent higher Monday while the rest of the market tanked 0.94 percent? Yep.
These are not your father's UAW-Big Three contract talks. Not when King is taking the GM deal public today in an unprecedented news conference that his predecessors Ron Gettelfinger, Steve Yokich and Owen Bieber wouldn't even consider, much less do.
No, they preferred to look the other way and complain while union local presidents routinely leaked contract "highlighters" to Wall Street analysts and news organizations, whose reporters used the information to shape the narrative. King clearly wants his own chance to shape it because he understands media abhors a vacuum and that many of his members already are well-informed. He's right on both counts.
These are not your grandfather's UAW-Big Three contract talks when a sitting CEO — Chrysler Group LLC's Sergio Marchionne — writes a blistering letter to King as the contract deadline passed early last Thursday, says they both "failed" Chrysler employees and signals that the talks ahead are likely to be contentious.
If there are unspoken rules governing contract talks for Detroit's auto kingpins — and there are, however gutted by bailouts, recapitalization and new leadership — the Chrysler boss isn't about to be bound by them, even if he clearly gets the theatrical aspect of the role.
Case in point: On Monday back in Turin, headquarters to Fiat SpA, Marchionne used an assembled media claque to remind whoever is paying attention that Chrysler and GM are "two completely different entities with two different heritages. We were born in 2009 with $8 billion in debt; they had $50 billion in equity."
Meaning those $5,000 signing bonuses at GM are likely to be smaller for a company whose earnings the past few quarters barely broke even while GM tallied $10.4 billion net over the past six quarters. Think they call that managing expectations.
These are not your other grandfather's auto talks when the union that has spent, oh, forever, demonizing operations down in Mexico (and in Canada) could soon be receiving larger profit-sharing payouts because sister plants south of the border account for sizable chunks of North American profitability.
The change makes sense for all sorts of reasons, starting with the obvious fact that North American earnings are easily defined in public securities filings; are a cornerstone of formulas used to calculate executive and salaried bonus payouts; and are the mother lode of corporate profitability in post-bailout Detroit.
And more: GM's pledge to restart its idled Spring Hill, Tenn., plant is a win for the UAW that resonates beyond the simple commitment itself. The move suggests the operation could be competitive, could augur well for GM sales in the States and could again be a UAW outpost in a right-to-work state whose foreign-owned rivals employ the would-be union members King covets.
And the promised rise of as much as $3 an hour in the wages for second-tier hires at GM? It's crucial to the longer-term viability of the UAW and its dues base, and it eases public pressure on automakers because the increases should place the pay rate on a par with the average national manufacturing hourly wage of $18.88 an hour, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Whether Chrysler, home to the lowest "second-tier" wage of $14.89, follows GM's lead will show just how hard a bargain Marchionne is prepared to drive. And Ford Motor Co., the only one of Detroit's three automakers to avoid bankruptcy and the one most likely to close out the contract talks?
With a second-tier rate that hovered just below $17 an hour last year and is set to increase to more than $19 an hour by 2015, according to confidential industry figures compiled for the contract talks and obtained by The Detroit News, the upward pressure on Chrysler to catch up likely will test both Marchionne's resolve and King's negotiating savvy.
These bellwether talks are far from complete, but early indications are reasons for all sides to be cautiously optimistic, notwithstanding a flatling national economy that could temper everything. Quickly.
www.dn.com