Welcome to the Corvette Forums at the Corvette Action Center!

JCL Spiral Baffle-install

69MyWay

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 3, 2001
Messages
4,364
Location
Auburndale, Florida
Corvette
1969 Killer Shark
Okay,

Round one down, and one to go.

I just finished putting the driver side spiral baffle in Killer. Oh, yes I had to fire it off when I had the entire side pipe removed...what? what?.......there is a strange ringing sound in my ears now.

It is 12:30 p.m., and I am heading out to do #2.

Updates soon.
 
Saweet!!

Give us updates on SOTP factor pleaz.

If those glasspacks really restricted that exahaust your probably going to have to retune the EFI again. I would check it just for safe measure.

Frank
 
OK Chris, it's 2:30pm and I know it doesn't take 2 hours to install so you must be out scaring the neighbors. So what do ya think of them? Much better than the hooker stuff aren't they :D
 
He is out in the shop cleaning the car and getting it ready to terrorize the lil Mustangs of Orange Park. He will be in soon, and update everyone. :)

Nikki
 
Car is clean, I am showered and shaved, and ready to take it for a spin.

No problems at all doing the install. In fact, anybody that has done these pipes knows about the hassles with the tube mount stud.

I know Scott reshaped his mounting bracket and made new holes.

I tried something different. I drilled and pinned the mounting stud with a thin stainless washer so that it would stay on the frame while I mounted. Then, I just slid the pipe into place, twisted it over the studs, slapped the rubber washer on and tightened it up.

Sound wise, I can't tell much difference right now just sitting in the driveway.

I will have to give a full report after taking it to the cruise in tonight.

Thanks Scott.......You are the best.
 
I would have to say that the hooker baffles were beefier sounding at an idle, and part throttle. There was more bass tone to the car before. Now, there is a more "metalic" sound to the exhaust.

I can say that at hard throttle the sound is more like a race car. Very tight, crisp, and clean. My WOT feels stronger, and it feels as if it is pulling harder to 6,000 RPM.

Volume wise, I can't tell any difference. In other words, it seems no louder than the off road Hooker baffles I had in there.

The pipe does not seem to hold heat as much either.

I am happy with them.
 
Chris,

Glad to hear you like them, and glad I could help out. Now you'll have to get me a good video/sound clip when you get time :D
 
69MyWay said:
I can say that at hard throttle the sound is more like a race car. Very tight, crisp, and clean. My WOT feels stronger, and it feels as if it is pulling harder to 6,000 RPM.

Did you have a dyno test of the car with the Hooker inserts installed by any chance?

A before 'n after set of test results would be a very helpful bit of information to have.

I'm using Pertronics inserts right now:

http://www.pertronix.com/exhaust/patriot2002.pdf

on page #24. Note they also sell a JCL type auger baffel as well. Pertronics has a lot of unique street 'rod type exhaust stuff, a helpful resource to keep in mind for your other project cars.

I was using Shoenfeld race "mufflers" originally - a straight 3" pipe with holes punched into it with a .5" larger diameter pipe sleeve over it, and it was as you'd expect, deafening, but lots of fun :)

I've ditched the Shoenfelds and now have two sets of pipes - one set with the Pertronics inserts in them and the other just straight pipes with turn downs for the track or whenever I feel grumpy ;-)

Thanks!
Allen
 
69MyWay said:
-six speed
-better brakes
-steeroids---maybe.
-strip and repaint the nose of the car

Mmm T56 :) http://temp.corvetteforum.net/c3/gwhite75/

I've got a newly built M22 (using almost all new parts from Autogear) going in instead, as the T56 conversion is just too much for me to handle right now.

Maybe in a few years when I'm young and rich again I'll do the T56 modification. That would really put some long legs on the old beast.

As to the brakes, check out Brad Waller's Wilwood setup:

http://ep.com/brad/Corvette/Wilwood/

Power steering is a No Go for me, at least until I'm too ancient to grunt my way around parking lots.

There is a company selling a power steering conversion that replaces the manual steering box with a modified unit from a Chevy truck. It's under $700 and doesn't reduce the turning radius any. I can't recall the name of the company, though I posted a link to their page a while back. A search for my post should turn up the link.

CYa!
Allen
 
Allen,

Thanks for the info. I had no idea that Pertronix made all that stuff.

As far as the trans goes, I am dead set on the Richmond six.

I see it as having several advantages.

1. reuse my lakewood housing, and hydraulic clutch release bearing.--including my new on the shelf Quartermaster clutch.

2. Shifter fits through the stock console location.

3. No mods needed to the drive shaft

4. Better range of gear selection from 1st-6th.

5. Bragging rights of a full blown ROD six speed gear box.

I have looked at a variety of others on the market, and stock replacements from the F body to the Vette, and in between. There are trade offs with all of them.

I have a ZF 6 in my 90 and I really love that trans. We have the new style 6 in our 2000 Vette, and it is not as smooth and direct as the ZF. However, the ZF is a noisy mother lover, especially with the single mass flywheel conversion. I mean....it is NOISY - like a rod is coming out of the block until I depress the clutch pedal. From time to time, the noise will transmit into the knock sensor and retard my timing on take off....very bad (I am working on that one).


One of the goals in building the 69 was not making any compromise in comfort due to the need for speed. So, the power steering was a must, along with the vintage A/C, keyless, power windows, etc. etc. etc.

This car will never see any competition driving (that is what the 90 vette is for), so saving weight, or reducing rotating mass has never been an important goal.

We did scale the car though and found out that it is less than 100 pounds heavier than my 90 Vette!

I might.....do some exibition Auto X with the 69 this spring. I save the total tire and clutch melt down action for the 90.
 
69MyWay said:
Allen,

Thanks for the info. I had no idea that Pertronix made all that stuff.

Your welcome, neither did I. I could have used some of their parts on other cars, would have saved me some fabrication work for certain.

As far as the trans goes, I am dead set on the Richmond six.

I see it as having several advantages.

1. reuse my lakewood housing, and hydraulic clutch release bearing.--including my new on the shelf Quartermaster clutch.


That is a non-trivial advantage. AFAIK, no one makes an SFI rated conversion bell housing for the T56. Ditching my Lakewood is not something I look forward to having to do. The only thing you can do is install a SFI rated kevlar blanket around the bell housing and hope that holds should the flywheel let go.

Do you happen to know the max input torque spec for the ROD? My mouse is making 485 #/Ft in this revision, and is going to top well over 525#/Ft in the next. That's what drove me to retire the M21 and install an M22.

2. Shifter fits through the stock console location.

This one doesn't concern me very much. I very much prefer the T56 shift feel over the Hurst on the M21. I've never driven a ROD equipped car, so I'm clueless on how that tranny setup feels when grabbing gears.

Is the ROD an internal rail or external type linkage?

3. No mods needed to the drive shaft

That's a bit of a $saver there.

4. Better range of gear selection from 1st-6th.

You do get a heck of a range of ratios, a good thing. You'd have to go to a Jerico or Liberty box to get anything resembling that kind of flexibility in available ratios.

I'm running 3.70's in the pumpkin now. It's a compromise between streetability and performance. 3500RPM @ 70MPH in 4th is enough. Sure would be nice to drop that nearer to 2000RPM like in my Camaro, that would really give the car legs.

5. Bragging rights of a full blown ROD six speed gear box.

Ahh, is there magic in the ROD tranny at car shows and the like then? Coming from the burnout perfume lovers crowd, the M22 has always gotten the nod as The One :)

I have looked at a variety of others on the market, and stock replacements from the F body to the Vette, and in between. There are trade offs with all of them.

However, the ZF is a noisy mother lover, especially with the single mass flywheel conversion. I mean....it is NOISY - like a rod is coming out of the block until I depress the clutch pedal. From time to time, the noise will transmit into the knock sensor and retard my timing on take off....very bad (I am working on that one).

That doesn't (pun!) sound right. Is something wrong? The ZF Vettes I've driven in are not at all noisy. Besides, with your side pipe setup, does a little gear noise really matter? ;-)

One of the goals in building the 69 was not making any compromise in comfort due to the need for speed. So, the power steering was a must, along with the vintage A/C, keyless, power windows, etc. etc. etc.

Yep, your Vette is much plusher than mine, and stuffing a ROD6 under the floorboards is going to take it a giant step forward towards the fastest plush ride around :)

My goals for my '69 are to keep the classic lines of the car inside and out, while stuffing as much power, tire and handling into it as I can with more than just a wink at on track safety (Lakewood and fuel cell are in the car now, 4 point bar and 5 point harnesses are coming with the next engine).

This car will never see any competition driving (that is what the 90 vette is for), so saving weight, or reducing rotating mass has never been an important goal.

We did scale the car though and found out that it is less than 100 pounds heavier than my 90 Vette!

I might.....do some exibition Auto X with the 69 this spring. I save the total tire and clutch melt down action for the 90.

Never say Never where a Vette is concerned ;-) Making some fun run passes down the strip or blasting around a road course on a SCCA HPDE day just kinda "happens" you know :D

My car comes in at 3279# with a full cell of gas. Corner weights and front to rear show the car is very well balanced 49%/51% front to rear and 51/49 left to right.

Putting my butt into the seat changes those a little bit to 47/53 F:R and 50/50 L:R. Not too bad at all for a street rod really.

Tnx!
Allen

PS: Can I ping you on pre-post JCL dyno #'s?
 
The ROD is an external shifter (just like the muncie).

My pre-JCL dyno numbers were terrible. I should have done another dyno run after tweaking the EFI.

It will be a bit before I get it back on a dyno machine.

The ROD max torque is pretty high, but I don't remember the numbers.

They have two version--a 10 spline and 27 spline unit. The 27 spline is supposed to be a bit tougher than the old rock crusher up through 5th gear. They don't suggest hammering them in overdrive.

With the ROD you can get your 70 mph cruise close to 2,000 RPM with no problem at all.

KEN here on the site has a ROD in his 87 vette. I drove his car and was very impressed with the overall feel, quality, and performance of the transmission. It is a very nice unit, and that really sold me on it.


As far as my 90 goes.....yes, they ALL have a noise problem from 89-96. That is whay they used a super heavy dual mass (as in two piece heavy mother lover) flywheel. The stock flywheel would dampen the action to reduce noise.

Ask anybody on the C4 forum about the noise six speeds (with the clutch out in neutral). When I went to the single mass, I gained significantly quicker revs, but also gained horrific trans noise.

I autocrossed the mess out of the car early last year. The starters would usually ask me if I had a problem with the car when I was staging and waiting for my shot at the track. Then i would push in the clutch, noise go away, and I would just smile and say "fixed it".
 
69MyWay said:
The ROD is an external shifter (just like the muncie).

My pre-JCL dyno numbers were terrible. I should have done another dyno run after tweaking the EFI.

It will be a bit before I get it back on a dyno machine.

The ROD max torque is pretty high, but I don't remember the numbers.

They have two version--a 10 spline and 27 spline unit. The 27 spline is supposed to be a bit tougher than the old rock crusher up through 5th gear. They don't suggest hammering them in overdrive.

With the ROD you can get your 70 mph cruise close to 2,000 RPM with no problem at all.

KEN here on the site has a ROD in his 87 vette. I drove his car and was very impressed with the overall feel, quality, and performance of the transmission. It is a very nice unit, and that really sold me on it.


As far as my 90 goes.....yes, they ALL have a noise problem from 89-96. That is whay they used a super heavy dual mass (as in two piece heavy mother lover) flywheel. The stock flywheel would dampen the action to reduce noise.

Ask anybody on the C4 forum about the noise six speeds (with the clutch out in neutral). When I went to the single mass, I gained significantly quicker revs, but also gained horrific trans noise.

I autocrossed the mess out of the car early last year. The starters would usually ask me if I had a problem with the car when I was staging and waiting for my shot at the track. Then i would push in the clutch, noise go away, and I would just smile and say "fixed it".

All good info, thanks!

I've never been in a ZF car with an after market flywheel. I'll file that bit of trivia away for a rainy day too.

Nothing like the firm application of the throttle to fix a problem is there? :)

Darn on the dyno numbers, a back to back test of the two baffles would be very good to have. Bonus would be a dBA sound meter reading given the sound restrictins at many tracks now adays :(

Thanks for the post!

Allen
 

Corvette Forums

Not a member of the Corvette Action Center?  Join now!  It's free!

Help support the Corvette Action Center!

Supporting Vendors

Dealers:

MacMulkin Chevrolet - The Second Largest Corvette Dealer in the Country!

Advertise with the Corvette Action Center!

Double Your Chances!

Our Partners

Back
Top Bottom