Hi everyone; Here is my Question:
The 78 350 is one of the lowest compression engines ever in a Corvette. The HP rating was only 5 hp over the 80 305. Now I have had an 80 305 Vette and like it very much. It could use a little more torque. But back to the question, Using the 305 small chamber head on the 78 350. The chamber are 58cc a bit small than the 350 heads. Exh. valve are the same and intakes are 1.84. Which is not that much smaller than the 1.94 in the 350 heads. Compression rato should be up from 8.5 to 9.2 with just the head change. Sounds like easy HP gain to me.
So, what do you think? :confused
Thanks for any input on this.
Gary
The 78 350 is one of the lowest compression engines ever in a Corvette. The HP rating was only 5 hp over the 80 305. Now I have had an 80 305 Vette and like it very much. It could use a little more torque. But back to the question, Using the 305 small chamber head on the 78 350. The chamber are 58cc a bit small than the 350 heads. Exh. valve are the same and intakes are 1.84. Which is not that much smaller than the 1.94 in the 350 heads. Compression rato should be up from 8.5 to 9.2 with just the head change. Sounds like easy HP gain to me.
So, what do you think? :confused
Thanks for any input on this.
Gary