Aurora40
Well-known member
----
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I want to add that while some car models may make more power, that in itself does not mean it will be a "more desireable model" over time - I think a car like the Callaway Corvette will prove to be on par w/ legends such as L88's in the long run*89x2* said:I agree that once a car has been restored, sometimes even repainted, its value is less than a "survivor". That said, Callaways might be the exception (many were repainted during aero installation).
The majority of Callaway Corvettes were carriers of the unique RPO B2K option and that is recognized by everyone including GM, etc. The Aerobodies did not show up as an RPO however, my personal thoughts on this are ANY B2K built after car # 89-005 with an aerobody is correct. Why is this? 89-005 wore the prototype bodywork and it took a bit of time to get them (production) rolling. Many 1989 owners intended to have their B2K's leave Old Lyme wearing the bodies but it was often dificult to have body and car produced at the same run. I know some owners paid for Aerobodies and have paperwork dating back to before their cars were constructed, even though the bodies and car did not "meet" in Old Lyme, the body was paid for prior to construction.
If I see an Aerobody on an 87 or 88, I know it could not have been original but, it is a correct offering from Callaway and to me, honestly, it reduces value in NO WAY to me - I would say it adds value as it is a desireable kit
Now, What about the "Direct Conversion" cars? They are Callaway Twin Turbo Corvettes w/out the RPO B2K. Why are there cars out there w/ out the RPO? A few reasons why - A GM strike kept supply down, dealers sent cars they had, rather than wait and also, cars were brought there out of the "pool" to become TT's by owners, etc. at other times too.
Are they any "less" of a Callaway, Hardly. They have ALL of the same power and looks, minus 3 little alpha-numerics in the glove box. The nice thing is, Callaway Cars has maintained a list of ALL cars built and can verify them - I drove car #89-069, a direct conversion car. It was one of the most powerful cars I have ever sampled and was correct and wore all emblems / plaques.
Now what about originality?? The wheels should be Dymags (16" or 17" ) in 1987 or the stock 87 wheels... 17" Dymags were on 88-90's and some 91's. OZ 17" wheels were also on some 91's - check w/ Callaway Cars to see what yours should have.
Other mods, Exhaust - fine for the road but, the NCRS, etc will want the Callaway offered exhaust - either Megaphones or, the stock high flow's w/ Callaway embossed tips.
Engine mods - again, mods that were done, offered by Callaway are fine and should be doccumented otherwise judging will reflect this.
I recently found out Callaway Cars offered a ZF6 -or- Richmond 6 speed conversions for 4+3 cars, both would be correct then, with paperwork.
I have talked to a few folks about this and am always finding doccuments about "correctness".
In no way, am I saying do not modify your car, just save (tag&bag) your original parts if you doHope this helps
![]()