Welcome to the Corvette Forums at the Corvette Action Center!

Body finally back on project 59

John Mcgraw

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 18, 2003
Messages
816
Location
Austin Tx
Corvette
1960 Roman red, 1959 resto-rod, 1965 resto-rod
Hi guys,
I have been really busy at work, and have not been able to work on the car for the last couple of weeks. This weekeend, I dropped the body back on the frame. I have been running wire and am just about through with this task. I am running all the wire behind the inner fenders so that when you look under the hood, you will not see any of the wiring. The engine control wiring will also be pretty much hidden from view by the fuel rail covers, so it should make for a pretty clean looking engine bay. Saturday, I fabricated a couple of heat shields to go over the pipes and mufflers out of stainless. I was worried about the asthetics of them, bit I needn't have been concerned, since you almost can not even see them from under the car. If you look in the pics, you will see them hiding above the mufflers, but you really have to look for them!
They have almost 3/4" of air space between the top of the shield and the floor pan, so they should be real effective at keeping the heat out of the cockpit, especially when coupled with the floor pan insulation that will be going in. I got my upholstery material chosen and ordered, now all I need to do is get my upholstery guy motivated to get started. I can not get my dash in and my wiring finished until he at least gets the leather on the dash pad.
I say leather, but in fact, I have followed the lead of most of the street rod guys, and am using ultraleather on the car. It is an incredibly soft and realistic leather substitute that is supposed to out perform leather is every regard, with none of the problems associated with it. It is a lot more than leather, but the waste from cutting is almost nil, so it should about balance out. It is really an incredible product, and feels like the softest glove leather you have ever felt. At $75 a yard it is expensive but I hope that it will prove to be worth it. It is going to a be a very light buff color. This week I hope to get my splash pans fabricated and the remainder of the brake and fuel plumbing completed. With any luck I will be able to get this puppy fired up within a month if I can get my upholstery guy busy!
Check out the folder marked 10-10-04.
http://www.villagephotos.com/pubgallery.asp?id_=339303
 
Sweet, John. There's some real artistry there. :eek
 
Looks Great!

I wish I could see the large version of the pictures, I get the BIG X:confused
 
Incredible John. The craftsmanship is as exceptional underneath as it is topside and the body sits very nice on the chassis. Love to look at the photos of your progress. You set a very high standard.
 
Thanks Bob,

It ain't going to have the brute force of your car, but it ought to make a nice highway cruiser! How much longer before you are ready to take your car on its maiden voyage? I sure enjoyed the clip of your car running for the first time!

Regards, John McGraw
 
You know John the last couple of times I spoke with you on the phone you sounded stressed,I just hate it when work gets in the way of pleasure.You have to be real happy now lacing the wires.(I am trying to find a good source now for a hand held soldering gun and the tiny shrink wrap tupes)

It looks great and I have said it before your craftmans ships shows thru out the entire car.
 
Excellent craftsmanship and finish John. I can't wait to see it in person at a local show next year.

Doug
 
Larry,

You are right about being stressed. About 4 months ago our company decided to Exit the Texas market, and all of us were preparing to be unemployed next year.
We went to our senior management, and made a compeling argument that they were making a mistake by exiting Austin. After several meetings, they agreed with our assement, and instead of going away, they now are going to an additional 2-3 million sq/ft of office space in the next few months! I have gone from just waiting out the end, to not having enough time to get everything done that needs doing. The next few months is going to be really stressful as I try it integrate this much new equipmrent into our operation.

You are correct about the stance of the car. I raised up the shocks last weekend since the frame had been dragging on the lift as it went on, but I got a little carried away! I didn't have a good handle on how much adjustment at the shock equaled how much at the frame. Actually, the car sits almost a inch lower in the front and 1/2" lower in the rear than stock, but the lower profile tires makes the gap over the tires look huge. I am going to probably bring the car back down about 1/2", and I am going to remove 3/8" of spacer between the body and frame. The SRIII frame sits a lot lower than the stock one due to the triangulated frame having that lower tube, and I don't want to be rubbing that lower tube over bumps. If I had it to do over, I probably would have opted for some shockwave air units rather than the coilovers, but they were still a new product at the time and I was not sure of them. You never know, I may put them on in a year or so if I have problem with the frame dragging. It would sure be nice to be able to raise the car up around town, and then drop it in the weeds for highway driving and when parked!

Regards, John McGraw
 
John,

The car looks fantastic. I'm sure you are anxious to get it on the road. Best of luck in finishing it.

Interesting comment about the ride height adjustment. Any observations about how much a turn on the coil adjustment makes to the ride height?

Rich
 
Hi Rich,

It appears that the ratio is about 1.5 to 1. For every 1" in shock adjustment it rasied the car about 1.5". This ratio changes no doubt as the angle of the shock changes and as the control arm moves through its arc, but that is what I experienced at the lower limits of extension. I am anxiously awaiting updates on your 63, as I have recently bought a 65 convertible basket case, and am probably going to be ordering one of Mike's frames for it as well. I think that this one will be a LS6 instead of the LS1 since I will be able to use a little larger rubber on the rear, and able to utilize the additional power. I may even do a Magnacharger engine.
Thanks for the reccomendation on Speed Scene. Zac did a beautiful job on my engine harness, and is just a few minutes away if I ever have an issues with the ECM program.

Regards, John McGraw
 
John,

Thanks for the info on setting the ride height. I know there will be some playing with that to get the stance I want but it's good to have a rule of thumb for the adjustment.

Glad the wiring harness worked out fine. He does do nice work.

As for the 63 project, we plan to take our time with this one and enjoy it. While I have a detailed plan there is no "cast in stone" end date - at least not yet. :D

I do like Mike's design for the C2 chassis. There is a reference to it on page 12 in the December issue of Corvette Fever along with a picture of it sitting in our garage. We have a lot of body work to do on this one (besides the mods needed to fit the new chassis) and the chassis is now being used for test fitting as well as replacing the entire nose. So it will be a while before I get the chassis back here to work on it and the suspension.

Thanks again,

Rich
 
You know John I spent alot of time researching the air bag set ups (I actually want to drop the car on its frame at car shows) I decided against it for ride quaility. I plan on driving my car and wanted a perfect ride over all else.
 
Larry,

You are correct. while there is some selection for spring rate on the shockwave units, it is nothing like the choices that you get with coilovers. I have started out with 250 lb springs on the rear and 300 lb on the front, but if I find that too stiff, I can allways change them. The replacement springs are only about 15 bucks each. I would guess that with that monster cast iron motor, that you probably started out with 350's on the front. I have a sneaking suspision that I may end up with my 250's on the front and end up buying a new set of 200's for the rear, but I will wait and see what the ride quality is like.


Regards, John McGraw
 
John Mcgraw said:
Larry,

You are correct. while there is some selection for spring rate on the shockwave units, it is nothing like the choices that you get with coilovers. I have started out with 250 lb springs on the rear and 300 lb on the front, but if I find that too stiff, I can allways change them. The replacement springs are only about 15 bucks each. I would guess that with that monster cast iron motor, that you probably started out with 350's on the front. I have a sneaking suspision that I may end up with my 250's on the front and end up buying a new set of 200's for the rear, but I will wait and see what the ride quality is like.


Regards, John McGraw
John I also figured with the cost of them and the ease of replacement I would take a shot at what I thought would work well.I choze the dual rate for the rears and have the 400 up front with the idea I may have to drop down for the 350's. Mike recomendation was a 350 on a cast iron small block so I jumped to the 400's for my big block figuring for the added weight of the big block. time will tell.I am trying to set the height to the bottom of the frame the same as my C5 I dont scrape anything with that car so I think I should be good.I actually purchased the body mounts for a C3 but they raised the body up too high in the wheel wells and I am going to use the stock mounts instead.

I drop you a picture of my door pulls and door openers theyy are made by a company called Big Als and made of billit aluminum and are really cool. I almost have a final design on the door panels
 
Larry,

I would appreciate the door release pics. I am building my door panels right now and still have not decided whether to use the original releases or to go with one of the nice oval aluminum ones like most of the rodders. I have pretty much decided not to install the inside door lock lever, since I never saw it as being very usefull anyway. I used 1/8" ABS plastic for my door panels, and this should be a big improvement on the original cardboard ones! I am using AVECO clips to attach them rather than the screws, and am keeping the original arm rest/ pull.
The 58-60 arm rest is such a beautiful part and fits the door so well, that I figured I could not improve on it! Billy Dawson makes some nice brushed stainless sheet metal to replace the original textured aluminum ones, and I am picking up a set tomorrow when I go to see him. I have decided to keep the reflector units on the door panels. I really want to keep the style of the original panels while just giving them a modern touch. The door latch release mechanisim allways looked just a little crude to me!

Regards, John McGraw
 
John I will get you a picture late tonight.(I have to work late) The ones I am using are billet armrests with the door opener in it allready and a light ,whats taking so long to do is building speaker enclosures for the stereo that I plan on installing.And I am aiming them directly towards my ear level down the center of the car.I am trying to mold it into the panel so it looks semi nautral.
 
IH2LOSE said:
whats taking so long to do is building speaker enclosures for the stereo that I plan on installing.And I am aiming them directly towards my ear level down the center of the car.I am trying to mold it into the panel so it looks semi nautral.

Larry

I may not know much (if anything at all) about working on cars, but i DO know a fair bit about car audio systems. I've even designed and helped install systems worth $75,000 or more and that were winning systems in national car audio competitions. It's been a number of years now since I was in that industry and many things have changed but the basics of acoustics do not.
If I may make a suggestion or two regarding the stereo system I hope you won't be offended by the unsolicited advice.

Regarding the front speaker placement, your optimum placement would actually be the kick panel area with the speakers aimed up and towrds the opposite side of the car directed to the other person. This means the drivers side kick panel speaker would aim toward the passenger at ear level and the passenger side kick panel speaker would aim toward the driver at ear level.
The main reason for this is too try to equalize (as much as possible) the wavelength between the left and right speakers. If the speakers are in the doors, the speaker on the left side is only a few inches or maybe 12-18" from your ear but the right side speaker could be 3-4' away from you. this causes the entire "soundstage" to appear to be coming from the side of the car you are sitting on. By moving the speakers down to the kick panel area, there will still be a difference in distance between the left and right side speakers to you but the difference is reduced and therefore your soundstage and imaging is greatly improved.

If you feel that for whatever reason you can't go with the speakers in the kick panel and MUST go with them in your doors, than at least try to put them as low and as forward in the doors as possible and again cross-fire them to the opposite side aiming at the ears of the occupent in the other seat (direct the drivers side speaker to the passenger at ear level and vice versa). try to avoid aiming the speakers straight across and firing directly at each other as this will cause a loust soundstage, imaging, and even worst, phase cancelation.

If at all possible, wherever you mount the speakers, see if you can construct an enclosure of the speaker (fiberglass would be perfect) for much better sound quality and if it IS in the doors than sound dampening material such as dynamat is great to reduce resounce and vibrations that will detract from your sound quality.

If you have any questions regarding your system or anything I can do to help you in this area i'll be glad to. Maybe I can finally help someone else out on this forum for a change!
:)
 
John

I apologize for sidetracking your thread.
i'm sure if Larry needs any help from me on his stereo he can PM me or we can start a new thread.

Barry
 

Corvette Forums

Not a member of the Corvette Action Center?  Join now!  It's free!

Help support the Corvette Action Center!

Supporting Vendors

Dealers:

MacMulkin Chevrolet - The Second Largest Corvette Dealer in the Country!

Advertise with the Corvette Action Center!

Double Your Chances!

Our Partners

Back
Top Bottom