red and black
Active member
How much more "abrupt" or noisy is the convertible versus the coupe? This 1998 only has a tick over 7,000 miles but it seems to "thud and thump" much more than my 2002 coupe did. It also gives the rear end a much more "abrupt" feel.
I haven't totally discounted the shocks but with only 7k miles, I wonder?
Tires are the original Goodyear Eagle GT's and appear to be perfect though the rubber is probably getting a bit stiffer from age and "work hardened", since it'll break traction in a heartbeat.
Possibly the vert has that much more flex but I tend not to drive it as frisky as I would with my prior C5, nor would I on these older tires (the car was stored in a showroom type heated garage), and show no signs of age, but I still keep it at a max of 70 till I get new rubber on.
Would tower to tower braces be recommended on a vert? I don't wan't to go too nuts with swapping parts because my 02 was just fine dead stock.
I haven't totally discounted the shocks but with only 7k miles, I wonder?
Tires are the original Goodyear Eagle GT's and appear to be perfect though the rubber is probably getting a bit stiffer from age and "work hardened", since it'll break traction in a heartbeat.
Possibly the vert has that much more flex but I tend not to drive it as frisky as I would with my prior C5, nor would I on these older tires (the car was stored in a showroom type heated garage), and show no signs of age, but I still keep it at a max of 70 till I get new rubber on.
Would tower to tower braces be recommended on a vert? I don't wan't to go too nuts with swapping parts because my 02 was just fine dead stock.