MaineShark
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2002
- Messages
- 1,326
- Location
- Rockingham County, NH
- Corvette
- 1979 L82, 1987 Buick Grand National
Well, my cat-back exhaust is pretty much shot. I got an extra year out of it by welding patches over the holes in the y-pipe, but the patches are starting to fall off, so I'm looking to replace it, and trying to find a better solution than the Hooker exhaust that's on there.
For those who don't know, Grand Nationals have a large amount of exhaust resonance, aroudn 2000 rpm. The factory dual-crossflow (two in, two out muffler) exhaust solves that, but is very restrictive. Aftermarket exhausts are typically two separate mufflers, rather than a single, dual-crossflow muffler, but there are some aftermarket crossflow exhausts. The dual muffler exhausts have all that resonance. The aftermarket crossflow exhausts tend to either be just as restrictive as the factory exhaust, or flow well, but with too much noise (I like listening to the car, but I don't like having to turn the radio past half way, just to even hear it).
So, I've been doing a lot of reading on how people have solved this. I read one solution that seemed quite interesting; the owner had a dual-crossflow exhaust, but added some small racing mufflers before the crossflow muffler, one in each pipe. The resonance was cured, and the car runs in the 10's on pump gas, so I don't think that it can be called "restrictive." They are all straight-through perf-tube mufflers (Dynomax Ultraflo or similar).
Not one to copy others, I figured I'd do something a bit different, and see what it's like. What I'm thinking is to use a single-in, dual-out muffler in place of the "y" section of my y-pipe, then run back with dual pipes to a dual-crossflow muffler. The 3" in, dual-2.5" out Dynomax 17228 would replace the y, and would feed back to a dual-2.5" in and out 17231, out back. The 17228 is a ridiculously high-flow muffler (1400 scfm... good for up to 636hp, according to Dynomax), so I don't think that will be a problem. The 17231 is good for 1800 scfm, or 818hp, so that doesn't seem like it will be a problem, either. They are both 4.5"x9.75" oval mufflers, 14" long (19" with pipe stubs), so they should package reasonably well.
I'll have to find an exhaust shop to custom-bend the pipes, but that shouldn't be too hard.
Anyone have any thoughts on this? I think it has the potential to work well. And the 3" inlet will allow me to eventually upgrade to a larger cat-forward exhaust.
Joe
For those who don't know, Grand Nationals have a large amount of exhaust resonance, aroudn 2000 rpm. The factory dual-crossflow (two in, two out muffler) exhaust solves that, but is very restrictive. Aftermarket exhausts are typically two separate mufflers, rather than a single, dual-crossflow muffler, but there are some aftermarket crossflow exhausts. The dual muffler exhausts have all that resonance. The aftermarket crossflow exhausts tend to either be just as restrictive as the factory exhaust, or flow well, but with too much noise (I like listening to the car, but I don't like having to turn the radio past half way, just to even hear it).
So, I've been doing a lot of reading on how people have solved this. I read one solution that seemed quite interesting; the owner had a dual-crossflow exhaust, but added some small racing mufflers before the crossflow muffler, one in each pipe. The resonance was cured, and the car runs in the 10's on pump gas, so I don't think that it can be called "restrictive." They are all straight-through perf-tube mufflers (Dynomax Ultraflo or similar).
Not one to copy others, I figured I'd do something a bit different, and see what it's like. What I'm thinking is to use a single-in, dual-out muffler in place of the "y" section of my y-pipe, then run back with dual pipes to a dual-crossflow muffler. The 3" in, dual-2.5" out Dynomax 17228 would replace the y, and would feed back to a dual-2.5" in and out 17231, out back. The 17228 is a ridiculously high-flow muffler (1400 scfm... good for up to 636hp, according to Dynomax), so I don't think that will be a problem. The 17231 is good for 1800 scfm, or 818hp, so that doesn't seem like it will be a problem, either. They are both 4.5"x9.75" oval mufflers, 14" long (19" with pipe stubs), so they should package reasonably well.
I'll have to find an exhaust shop to custom-bend the pipes, but that shouldn't be too hard.
Anyone have any thoughts on this? I think it has the potential to work well. And the 3" inlet will allow me to eventually upgrade to a larger cat-forward exhaust.
Joe