- Thread starter
- #41
F
firedawg
Guest
Hey WhalePirot, what benefit do the heated o2 sensors have?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree. The 1st O2 is for ECM tuning. The ECM would not be able to tune the fuel trims from the 2nd O2 because the CAT alters the exhaust fumes. I think acceptable is basically a set # of hydrocarbons and unburned fuel. If you lean the car out before the emmissions test everything should go fine.WhalePirot said:The later cars, with 'dual' O2 sensors use the first for ECM (engine) fine tuning and the second sensor for keeping track that the CAT's operation is acceptable. I cannot define acceptable.
By heated type do you mean a wideband?WhalePirot said:Earlier cars, like mine (set up to look like an '87, but running a '90 speed density ECM) only have the 'first' O2 sensor. I also
changed to the heated type.
I dont think that's unburned fuel. If it was you would get popping with the CAT too. Also if the 1st O2 is there and adjusting the fuel trims, before the CAT, then you're exhaust should still be clean for the most part. I think that the popping is due to the CAT being gutted and now it has essentially been turned into a resonating chamber. I had a brand new CAT on my 81 Z28 and I replaced the mufflers with glass packs and I had popping sounds from those. I dunno though, I could be wrong, I'm no mechanic by any means.WhalePirot said:The popping sound, is unburned fuel exploding in your exhaust. I get a small amount of it, but you might wish to check your chip's adjustments to the fuel tables for a rich condition. My chip is very, very good, but might not be perfect in the decel area.
No flames; no pains.
I had a 93 LT1 T/A and noticed a huge performance gain from gutting the CAT. I had read an article about how a high flow CAT will actually out perform a gutted CAT. The article talked about how a gutted CAT will flow higher than a stock CAT but due to the chamber being hallow it causes air turbulence and flows less than a high flow CAT. Before I sold the car, to make it legal and to test the article I read, I put on a high flow CAT from www.racenet.net. After I got the CAT on I noticed that the exhaust was quiet enough to be tolerable; Althought, I did get a chance to hit Ennis (1/4mi) before I ended up selling the car and noticed a 2 1/2 mph loss in my traps. In my expirence the CAT does limit the performance considerably.invinceablevett said:Just my .02 cents if I may.I gutted the cat in my 1987 trans-am GTA with the 5.7 litre(350).It was just 2 years old.I did not find any "performance" enhancement even though it was faster than other 5.7 litre automatic trans-ams.Some people back then told me that it actually may have made my car slower. ...........I did however have a peculier smell of cooling fluid......Back then I had made just a few mods....air-foil,performance termostat and "powerchip".So I can't really say what it was that actually made my car a little quicker.......My guess is that the smell had something to do with the termostat.
hehe like mine! sounds even more Evil with long tube headersShaneL said:I've had no cats and no muffs for a while now and I am always getting comments about how the idle sounds so rough now... PURE EVIL SOUNDING
:JWhalePirot said:I believe that a wideband, which is a later sensor, used (so far) primarily on imports, is also heated, as a later device, but outputs a varying voltage to refine ECM adjustments. The 'old' sensors output three voltages for rich, lean and 14.7:1 stochiometric conditions.
All a wideband sensor does is just give you the readings. The wideband I have is just basically a fancy gauge that gives the exact voltage of your exhaust AFR. I used the Super AFC to tune my fuel trims. I would think that to tune the fuel trims on a vette you'll need to get a stand alone AEM or something like that.WhalePirot said:Ya know, a non-CAT car smells different from behind. I wonder when the SMOG cops will nail folks with the nasty EPA fine, based upon smell. Personally, I just feel much more comfy with a clean car, with great performance.
I'd like to know more about how a wideband O2 works with a '90 ECM, given that it was designed for the 'old' one. The fuel tables might not support that extra data very well or the ECM may not fully understand it.