errata.......
toms 007 said..........
L, I see this is your firs
t post, so "Welcome" to CAC. From the sound of your post, you have some knowledge in the area of engine build/function. We can always use such knowledge here. Don't be shy about posting and enjoy CAC.
...........................
well thanks for the kudos.........reason I came to CAC is it is a cut above. After seeing/reading all of Hib's writings I thought right. I have had a few Corvettes in the last century. Now I have been lurking and looking to buy another in near months....C6 or C7.
Now that I did some digging, and found that the LS7 cylinder head design and longevity was subject to my scrutiny (IMO), I should be prepared to pull things apart at some time after I buy. I found here and elsewhere a trove of information....and discarded the MIS-information. What I believe after two weeks of reading and looking on the designing of the LS cylinder heads with the LS7 package to deliver OVER 500 hp was a mighty goal 13 years ago. Very possibly the GM politicians pressured the 500 + and more possibly Ti valves, lash caps and more exotica. And numbers and goodies sells cars. I might think that using Stellite or even stainless valves would mean using higher valve spring numbers. back then in the dark ages Ti was magic ! So backing down the packaging would only deliver...400....450 ?? but with better longevity. But maybe I'm wrong. More displacement? Maybe. You cant have guns and butter. When you move into high gear production , as was West and the outsourced 5 axis machine company, it must be to tenths not inches when you are putting out a 500 hp street car. I still will be buying a Corvette.
toms 007 said..........
L, I see this is your firs
t post, so "Welcome" to CAC. From the sound of your post, you have some knowledge in the area of engine build/function. We can always use such knowledge here. Don't be shy about posting and enjoy CAC.
...........................
well thanks for the kudos.........reason I came to CAC is it is a cut above. After seeing/reading all of Hib's writings I thought right. I have had a few Corvettes in the last century. Now I have been lurking and looking to buy another in near months....C6 or C7.
Now that I did some digging, and found that the LS7 cylinder head design and longevity was subject to my scrutiny (IMO), I should be prepared to pull things apart at some time after I buy. I found here and elsewhere a trove of information....and discarded the MIS-information. What I believe after two weeks of reading and looking on the designing of the LS cylinder heads with the LS7 package to deliver OVER 500 hp was a mighty goal 13 years ago. Very possibly the GM politicians pressured the 500 + and more possibly Ti valves, lash caps and more exotica. And numbers and goodies sells cars. I might think that using Stellite or even stainless valves would mean using higher valve spring numbers. back then in the dark ages Ti was magic ! So backing down the packaging would only deliver...400....450 ?? but with better longevity. But maybe I'm wrong. More displacement? Maybe. You cant have guns and butter. When you move into high gear production , as was West and the outsourced 5 axis machine company, it must be to tenths not inches when you are putting out a 500 hp street car. I still will be buying a Corvette.