Hello,
I was at work yesterday and decided to check out the new Car & Driver. They did the test between the '02 Z06 and the 911 Turbo. They were supposed to include the Viper, but it's clutch blew!
Anyway, I read in the paper that GM estimated a 0-60 time of 3.9 seconds, but on the test; they pulled a 4.4 and I'm wondering what's with the big disparity. That's half a second! They clocked the 911 Turbo at 4.5 but Road & Track got the Turbo in at 4.0
I was wondering who is really right about this and how they come up with these figures. I mean, a half second in the 0-60 category is just too much. Are they talking about perfect test conditions? I know they use professional drivers, but what about the everyday driver?
On a funny note, I was driving to work the other morning and noticed a car was broken down at the stop light. I get up there and notice that it was a Mustang! To make it worse, it was a dealer Mustang and that means that the car must've been new
I was at work yesterday and decided to check out the new Car & Driver. They did the test between the '02 Z06 and the 911 Turbo. They were supposed to include the Viper, but it's clutch blew!
Anyway, I read in the paper that GM estimated a 0-60 time of 3.9 seconds, but on the test; they pulled a 4.4 and I'm wondering what's with the big disparity. That's half a second! They clocked the 911 Turbo at 4.5 but Road & Track got the Turbo in at 4.0
I was wondering who is really right about this and how they come up with these figures. I mean, a half second in the 0-60 category is just too much. Are they talking about perfect test conditions? I know they use professional drivers, but what about the everyday driver?
On a funny note, I was driving to work the other morning and noticed a car was broken down at the stop light. I get up there and notice that it was a Mustang! To make it worse, it was a dealer Mustang and that means that the car must've been new
