Hib Halverson
Technical Writer for Internet & Print Media
This thread seems to have skated around the three questions posed in "Bolisk's" long first post. But...that's the nature of "oil discussions" on Internet forum sites. The oil companies, no matter what kind of oil they make, just love that their product is the subject of so much dialog.
Let's review "Bolisk's" three questions:
Now...that's not always been true. Up until the mid-'80s or so, there were seal materials--mainly plastics and rubbers--which were not compatible with the base stocks used by many synthetic oils back then. The result was seal degradation and eventual leakage. That is from where the perception that all synthetic oils cause seal failure comes. Today, seal degradation in old engines with original gaskets and seals, is not as common because some lubricant makers have altered their formulations to be more "old-seal-friendly" but, the problem still does occur. IMO, if you want to switch to synthetic in a really old engine, you ought to change most of the gaskets and seals, anyway.
So...if you've got an engine, transmission or axle that dates to before the mid-80s and its gaskets and seals are original, there is a chance there will be leakage.
Second, synthetics can cause limited slip noise or chatter but...so can petroleum-based oils. That statement is ridiculous in its wide range. Some limited slip differentials use multiplate wet clutches and those are the type most prone to noise or chatter. The cone type limited slips (none are used in Corvettes) can also be problematic. Other types of diffs--Torsens (a limited slip which do not use clutches) lockers or ratcheting diffs (which are not limited slips, anyway) are not susceptible to lubricant-driven noise or chatter.
As to whether or not synthetic gear lubricants, inherently, cause chatter...the only ones that do are either not formulated properly or are incorrect for the application. That said, there are other reasons a lubricant can cause limited slip noise or chatter, but they are not specific to the base stock of the lubricant they are more dependent on the additive package in the lubricant, especially friction modifiers. For example, if you replace a petroleum-based gear lubricant which has 3% friction modifier with a synthetic lubricant having 1% FM, you may have chatter with the synthetic but it's not a fault of the synthetic base stock, it's a problem with not enough additive. You could replace a petro-based lube with another petro-based lube which has less friction modifier and have the same result: noise or chatter.
Third: the idea that synthetics won't work with tolerances present in older engines, transmissions or axles is B.S. Whether or not a lubricant will work with a given clearance is dependent on the lubricant's viscosity not it's base stock.
An example: take the modern T56 six-speed in a 2010 Vette versus the ancient M21 four-speed in a 1970 Vette. The modern transmission uses ATF, a very low viscosity lubricant. The Muncie uses an SAE 90 gear lubricant a high viscosity lubricant. It doesn't matter what the base stock is--petro. or synth.--if you put ATF in the Muncie it will fail and if you put SAE 90 in the T56 it will fail.
Same is true with engines. With a stock or near stock bearing clearances, if you replace a 5W30 or 10W30 oil with the SAE60 or 70 used in a Top Fuel motor, you're going to have problems. Newer engines still use a 5W30 or 10W30 and, depending on the duty cycle, come factory-filled with either petroleum-base oils or synthetic oils.
With respect to just engine oil, what engines really need synthetic?
Any engine factory filled with it, should have it.
Any engine that's run hard, ie: drag racing, road racing, very hard use on the street, will benefit from it. To be more specific, if the engine experiences sustained oil temperatures above 250 degrees F or any operation about 265°F, it needs a synthetic. Regardless of oil temperature, if the engine experiences loads far higher than it was designed for--such as a stock engine with a supercharger or nitrous oxide--will benefit from a synthetic oil.
Any engine which is run to extended oil drain intervals should use it.
Most other cases don't require it.
Can there be a benefit in using a synthetic in duty cycles other than those with high sustained oil temperatures? Yes but most using synthetic
Let's review "Bolisk's" three questions:
First, synthetics can leak from seals but...modern seals are no more prone to leakage with synthetic than they are with petroleum-based lubricants. That is, if the seal is: incorrect for the application, installed incorrectly, defective, worn or the structure or device it's sealing is worn, the seal will leak regardless of the base stock of the oil. On the other hand if none of those issues are present, the seal will prevent leakage, regardless of the base stock of the oil.1) Synthetic’s leak from the seals.
2) Synthetic’s cause limited slip/posi units to chatter (i.e. make noise).
3) Synthetic’s do not work with the tolerances of the older components.
Now...that's not always been true. Up until the mid-'80s or so, there were seal materials--mainly plastics and rubbers--which were not compatible with the base stocks used by many synthetic oils back then. The result was seal degradation and eventual leakage. That is from where the perception that all synthetic oils cause seal failure comes. Today, seal degradation in old engines with original gaskets and seals, is not as common because some lubricant makers have altered their formulations to be more "old-seal-friendly" but, the problem still does occur. IMO, if you want to switch to synthetic in a really old engine, you ought to change most of the gaskets and seals, anyway.
So...if you've got an engine, transmission or axle that dates to before the mid-80s and its gaskets and seals are original, there is a chance there will be leakage.
Second, synthetics can cause limited slip noise or chatter but...so can petroleum-based oils. That statement is ridiculous in its wide range. Some limited slip differentials use multiplate wet clutches and those are the type most prone to noise or chatter. The cone type limited slips (none are used in Corvettes) can also be problematic. Other types of diffs--Torsens (a limited slip which do not use clutches) lockers or ratcheting diffs (which are not limited slips, anyway) are not susceptible to lubricant-driven noise or chatter.
As to whether or not synthetic gear lubricants, inherently, cause chatter...the only ones that do are either not formulated properly or are incorrect for the application. That said, there are other reasons a lubricant can cause limited slip noise or chatter, but they are not specific to the base stock of the lubricant they are more dependent on the additive package in the lubricant, especially friction modifiers. For example, if you replace a petroleum-based gear lubricant which has 3% friction modifier with a synthetic lubricant having 1% FM, you may have chatter with the synthetic but it's not a fault of the synthetic base stock, it's a problem with not enough additive. You could replace a petro-based lube with another petro-based lube which has less friction modifier and have the same result: noise or chatter.
Third: the idea that synthetics won't work with tolerances present in older engines, transmissions or axles is B.S. Whether or not a lubricant will work with a given clearance is dependent on the lubricant's viscosity not it's base stock.
An example: take the modern T56 six-speed in a 2010 Vette versus the ancient M21 four-speed in a 1970 Vette. The modern transmission uses ATF, a very low viscosity lubricant. The Muncie uses an SAE 90 gear lubricant a high viscosity lubricant. It doesn't matter what the base stock is--petro. or synth.--if you put ATF in the Muncie it will fail and if you put SAE 90 in the T56 it will fail.
Same is true with engines. With a stock or near stock bearing clearances, if you replace a 5W30 or 10W30 oil with the SAE60 or 70 used in a Top Fuel motor, you're going to have problems. Newer engines still use a 5W30 or 10W30 and, depending on the duty cycle, come factory-filled with either petroleum-base oils or synthetic oils.
With respect to just engine oil, what engines really need synthetic?
Any engine factory filled with it, should have it.
Any engine that's run hard, ie: drag racing, road racing, very hard use on the street, will benefit from it. To be more specific, if the engine experiences sustained oil temperatures above 250 degrees F or any operation about 265°F, it needs a synthetic. Regardless of oil temperature, if the engine experiences loads far higher than it was designed for--such as a stock engine with a supercharger or nitrous oxide--will benefit from a synthetic oil.
Any engine which is run to extended oil drain intervals should use it.
Most other cases don't require it.
Can there be a benefit in using a synthetic in duty cycles other than those with high sustained oil temperatures? Yes but most using synthetic