gonfishn1960
Member
I respond to what I read xrcrx and you tried to be funny with your comments......anyway not that it matters but here is a little more on the RPO Z51. They did achieve 1.0g cornering if the kept the tires from cambering. Race cars are set up with the tires initially cambered 1 or 2 degrees negative so the outside hard cornering tire stays straight up. This works for race cars but not street cars because they are required to perform in rain, snow ,and ice.The resulting camber thrust experiened during straight driving and the tire wear would not be good. The tire wants to be straight up and down with as little toe as possible on the regular road. What they did was increase roll stiffness (the Z51) so the car would roll in the corner less. To achieve this front and rear spring rates got increased WAY beyond the original plan. As it was devolped, handling, accelaration and braking were great and all manuevers were conducted with the absense of pitch and roll, there was no oscillation, no overshoot the car did what was asked of it. Now this part goes back to my earlier post. They only drove this car on the proving grounds, with security such an important part of a new car program they drove it on very smooth or horribly rough roads and missed the subtle nuances of frost heaved roads until after the press got a hold of them. I think if I were going to spend 100 million developing a new car then, throw some cladding all over it and drive the sh-- out of it....xrcrx sorry about the bloodflow stuff....this is all good banterring and I love it