malc350
Well-known member
Hope this doesn't sound too stupid but what does anyone think of the above question?
The reason I ask is that my 90 (FX3) with Dymags rides better than any other C4 I've ever been in (with the possible exception of a 96 LT1 automatic I drove last year), including my 93.
Also the handling is absolutely spot on. I can place the car precisely whre I want in corners [apart from the REALLY bumpy ones ]
Admittedly my 93 had much higher miles and I suspect (maybe)the shocks were on the way out but my 90 really rides MUCH better.
As far as I can find out Callaway did nothing to the Twin Turbo suspension. Is that right?
Anyone had any similar experiences? Standard VS Dymag equipped vettes?
The reason I ask is that my 90 (FX3) with Dymags rides better than any other C4 I've ever been in (with the possible exception of a 96 LT1 automatic I drove last year), including my 93.
Also the handling is absolutely spot on. I can place the car precisely whre I want in corners [apart from the REALLY bumpy ones ]
Admittedly my 93 had much higher miles and I suspect (maybe)the shocks were on the way out but my 90 really rides MUCH better.
As far as I can find out Callaway did nothing to the Twin Turbo suspension. Is that right?
Anyone had any similar experiences? Standard VS Dymag equipped vettes?