Hib Halverson
Technical Writer for Internet & Print Media
(snip)
In the case of the LT1 and LT4 engine, the dual mass flywheel is used to quiet gear rattle and to balance the reciprocating engine mass.
On the LT1 and LT4 engine, the crankshaft is not balanced. The engine is not internally balanced. That job is left up to the flywheel and crankshaft damper. When one replaces a dual mass flywheel behind an LT1 or LT4 engine, the replacement dual mass flywheel must be balanced identically to the flywheel being replaced. If this is not done, vibration will inevitably harm the powertrain assembly.
Hope this clears up any misunderstanding regarding this marvel of automotive technology!![]()
Actually, it continues to cloud the issue.
Again...the reason a dual mass flywheel is used, rather than a standard or "single-mass" flywheel on the L98, LT1, LT4 or LT5 engines is to damp gear rattle in the ZF S6-40 transmission. The election by GM to go to the dual-mass has nothing to do with engine balance, either internal or external.
With a dual mass flywheel on a Gen 2 engine, the wheel itself (the "primary" mass, if you will) has extra weight to balance the engine's rotating assembly. The secondary mass (what makes the flywheel a "dual mass" wheel) connects to the transmission input shaft and has no role in engine balancing.
You can put a 93-97 Camaro flywheel, which is a standard type or "single-mass" wheel on Gem 2 V8 and, if the trim weights are in the correct holes, the engine would balance.
As I've said several times in this thread, the dual-mass flywheel was chosen by GM for use in all applications fitted with ZF S6-40 transmissions to damp gear rattle...not to balance the engine.
Also, further clouding the issue is the statement that Gen 2 V8s have both externally balanced crankshaft vibration dampers and flywheels. As pointed out elsewhere, that's not correct. Only the primary mass of the flywheel is externally balanced.