echoecho11
Well-known member
Slowride.... yes the LT5 is a good example... moving on to the new LS1/LS6 would be also. I'm one to get a littel up set when they refer these new engines as SBC's. they dont share the same bore / stroke or even the same firing order as my L98, fact is they have no interchagable parts with my 350. looking at them from a mecanics point of vue you can see they are desined to be built in many bore/stroke combonations,IE muttible desplacments. ( hay wate a minit SBC's started out as 265's and I jest read a artical were some body took there 427 bored and stroked SBC from CAL. to the Salt Flats, ran 200+ then drove it home. OK thats nothing new.) they have no destributor because they have a ring mounted on the crank to tell their multipule coils when to fire.(coils have a chance to cool so spark voltage stays high and consistant. ever ask a NASCAR guy why he has 2 coils under his hood) well they drive the oil pump off the crank." huh" the roller cam does not even have a gear on it and it and its roller rocker arms dont twist and it takes much less power to open and close the valves.( in 87 when chevy went to the roler cam they dropped the 305. the 4.3 -sawed of 350- v6 with a roller cam made more power.) thats not new drag rasers and the roundy round boys been doing that for years. ok ok what about this six bolt main all ALU block with the sunk crank shaft. these make simular tork/HP as LT4s but because of less internal loss rev much quicker(less to turn motor more to turn wheels) and wight less. ok ok I give. I'm dam glad they don'T make them like they use too..................bring on them new SMALL BLOCK CHEVY"S




