Robin,
Damn fine bike! Late T120R? I hope those megas are hollow!
Any engine internal mods? When I was a wide-eyed teenager there were just 2 things I wanted: an export (US spec) T140 Bonnie & a late C3 Vette. Got the Bonnie in '79 & got the Vette 21 years later (a long wait). I reckon that Bonnies are to the bike world what C3's are to the car world: both look fantastic, both handle really well at normal speeds but can start getting hairy once in 3 figures, both can still surprise modern stuff, both play music from the exhausts (once un-muted) & both can either be dead reliable or a complete nightmare if you get "The Wrong One" eg a "Friday Afternoon Job".
Are they Koni shocks you've got on there? After trying various different types of shocks over the last 26 years, Koni Dial-a-ride are by far the best I've found. Trouble is, Koni have stopped making them, but I've recently heard that an Aussie company are making them under licence & have called them Ikons.
Just so I don't hijack the thread completely, my wife drives a '67 MGB so I'm in a good position to compare it to a C3. For going out & having a few beers the MG wins every time as she drives
Obviously the Vette performance is superior (5700cc vs 1800cc) & the handling is generally better. C3's have a miniscule fraction of the rot problems MG's have (don't even think about Triumph Spitfires & Vitesses
). The one area the MG definately wins is when on single lane roads out in the country, the types with the really high hedges so's you can't see to the side or around corners. The MG is far better on these roads because it's more agile on them. It's also got the advantage of being a lot shorter so that you've got a chance to stop if an oncoming tractor is coming around a corner. With the Vette I'd probably impale the front into the tractor before I even saw it coming! On faster, wider roads the C3 is definately better & mine gives a better ride (the composite rear spring & gas shocks may help, maybe a stock C3 would be about the same?). I'd guess that on bumpy, twisty two lane roads the MG could well be better, but I haven't found out as most of those "fun" roads have either been widened, straightened or had 30mph limits imposed on them (due to whinging of the "safety brigade" who moan about roads being dangerous because some idiot that can't drive has crashed). If we do have to use roads like that then we take the Bonnies, as they were made for them & are better fun than either the C3 or the MGB on them
Spares are much cheaper for the MG than the Vette, but to counter that the MG uses Joe Lucas electrics (that lot have got a lot to answer for
). Generally the MG is better for slower, twisty lanes (what are called "B" roads here) & driving around town, as it's easier to squeeze into gaps (or maybe I'm not so paranoid about somebody running into it). The Vette is far better on "A" roads (& motorways).
People here have told me that I shouldn't compare the Vette to an MG, it should be compared to an E-type. Yeah, right. Maybe for performance, but the price difference alone would kill that comparisson. A good E-type is beyond my means, a REALLY good MGB (chrome bumper) fetches the same prices as a good C3 (generally MG's are cheaper than C3's of the same condition, but not by that much). In addition, the Vette was made as a sports car that most people could afford, as was the MG ie bang for the buck. The E-type may have been marketted as a sports car for everyman, but it didn't turn out that way. They were far cheaper than Italian exotica, but still more than most people could afford ie. the older generation to me is full of people that used to have MG's but very few are able to say that they had an E-type, although many admit to lusting after one. So the C3 is more equivalent to an MGB in that more "normal" people bought them, not just the wealthy or those with no commitments (or the completely irresponsible!). Hope this all made a bit of sense.
:cheers: