How did this thread end-up with so much progressive, "I love the Volt", liberal clap-trap which needs to go to another forum? Scottfab, xfire51, Vette LVR and everyone else who wants to fight over whether or not GM is "Government Motors", "Obama Motors", "UAW Motors" or "General Motors" need to visit the Edge.
As for C7...
From an ascetic standpoint, I think the car has two problems: 1) the end of the tradition of round or rounded tail lamps. While I don't think the "inverted Camaro" tail lamps are butt ugly, I do think they make the wrong visual statement. 2) the sharp edges and little "vent thingys" here-and-there on the car's exterior seem too Cadillac-like.
Otherwise, I think the C7's look is sort of evolutionary. I'm holding my judgement on the rear quarter windows until I actually see the car.
Technically, the car is going to be quite a step forward...lighter, handing as good or better than the equivalent C6 and a powertrain influenced by the Government's forcing revised CAFE on us.
It's possible that the car in the new issue of CD along with recent computer renditions which have been all over the web in recent months is actually the 2014 Grand Sport and not the base model C7.
I'd be remiss if I didn't address the long standing prediction I made here on CAC about the C7s' engine being a 5.5L V8. When GM Powertrain debuted the "new" (perhaps we should call it the "third") LT1 with 6.2-liters and 450-hp SAE, a big fat crow was on my plate ready for eating.
Boy, did I call that one wrong.
Or...did I?
Maybe the Grand Sports get the new LT1 and the base model, if there is such as thing, will have a 5.5.