I won't argue with your assumption of 85% electrical efficiency of an alternator , but you've forgotten another factor - the mechanical losses in transmission of mechanical energy from the engine to the alternator, and the frictional losses of the alternator itself.
My assumption of the 1 HP loss to the fan clutch included the mechanical loss within the pulley and drivebelt and additional frictional losses within the water pump over and above those of the water pump function..
Losses beyond these two factors for a clutch fan setup are related directly to the aerodynamical efficiencies of the fan blades themselves. If either the clutch fan is free wheeling, or the electrical fans are off, the characteristics of the fans are irrelevant.
I think if you look at total system efficiencies (engine drives alternator, which converts mechanical energy to electrical energy which is supplied to motors, which convert electrical energy back to mechanical) you'll see that the losses of that system are compounded and far more than the <1HP you calculate.
There again, everything I've said (which may make good common sense to some people) gets cancelled out because all, repeat ALL, Nascar cups busch trucks do it. I usually lose the discussion because somebody points out that you can buy the stuff from Summit or Jegs on the internet and THEY say it's good so it's GOT to be good.
Wanna buy some slightly used poly bushings?
