stevolwevol
Well-known member
Is it necessary to have the PCV valve routed into the carb? I can help but to wonder why all those crankcase fumes needs to go into the carburetor. Can it be plugged at the carb, and a breather installed instead?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, I was thinking of venting it instead of letting all that junk coming from the crankcase go into the intake. My engine is has only about 10000 miles on it, but crankcase gasses are still there. When I removed the stock intake to replace it with a performer, I noticed how dirty it was, possibly due to the way the PCV is set up. I could leave the PCV in, and put a vent on it, or remove the PCV entirely, and just having a vent cap like I have on the other valve cover. Would that work, or will I still get oil coating my engine compartment?
The crankcase vapors will accumulate under your hood area, which is why the pre '64 vehicles had a down draft tube almost to street level.
Ok, there was a tube that long. BUT, would having a breather with a filter prevent this?
By the way, my 69 Ford F100 had the same thing, a down draft tube, so it was being used post 64 maybe, unless it was arranged that way by a previous owner.
So far what I have learned from this thread is to just leave it the way it is. It wouldn't be real stylish to have a hose hanging near the ground, and probably wouldn't work with headers. I have seen that junk that looks like black molasses inside the intake, and in carburetors, probably from years of returning crankcase gasses into the system, so that's why I considered deleting it.Or it was an older engine. Possibly California started in 1964 and the Feds later on.
A filter may slow it down, but if and when that filter clogs the crankcase pressure will vent somewhere which is either your engine bay or gaskets.