D
designeraccd
Guest
As the saying goes: beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Or if one is concerned with surfaces that visually "fit" together as a unified whole, one might observe that the add-on lower parts are indeed added on, right down to the radius on the side of the air dam that does a whoopee (unplanned change of radius caused most likely by hand done pattern work from a "napkin sketch" versus professional design work now mostly done on specialized CAID software) about halfway towards the wheel opening leading edge. The taughtness of the add-on surfaces is very different from the full, beautifully blended surfaces of the C5's body. Incidentally, compare the flowing fillet radius around the perimeter of the sculpted indent versus the one (ones...) on the edge of the add-on parts: no concinnity.
IMO these parts would visually "fit" better on the planar surfaces of the Chevy Cobalt. DFO:W
Or if one is concerned with surfaces that visually "fit" together as a unified whole, one might observe that the add-on lower parts are indeed added on, right down to the radius on the side of the air dam that does a whoopee (unplanned change of radius caused most likely by hand done pattern work from a "napkin sketch" versus professional design work now mostly done on specialized CAID software) about halfway towards the wheel opening leading edge. The taughtness of the add-on surfaces is very different from the full, beautifully blended surfaces of the C5's body. Incidentally, compare the flowing fillet radius around the perimeter of the sculpted indent versus the one (ones...) on the edge of the add-on parts: no concinnity.
IMO these parts would visually "fit" better on the planar surfaces of the Chevy Cobalt. DFO:W