- Thread starter
- Admin
- #41
Interesting comments. Here's my thoughts:
You can't fault GM for the sneak peaks they're doing. Every automotive manufacturer does this. It helps build hype, and excitement. Personally, I think it's cool and I enjoy it. I want to be excited...ooohed..and ahhhed when they do finally pull the cover off. But that's just me.
I also don't mind the digital dash. From what I've seen so far, I really like it. I also see similarities to the digital dash that is now in the new generation SVT Viper which I love.
I have a 1990 ZR-1 which has a combination of digital and analog gauges. I don't mind it and after 45,000 miles, haven't had a problem with them. If I had to find a fault with them, it would have to be the tangerine color of them at night. However, not a deal breaker for me.
Every car has its commonly known issues. Its not just Corvette. Example: last weekend I had to pull out the left side headlight assembly to replace the gear in the popup headlight motor. In the early C4 years, GM used shitty plastic gears that disintegrated over time. In the later years they used stronger gears. It was an absolute bitch replacing this gear because of poor access/clearance to some of the bolts. Once I got the bolts out I couldn't get the final retaining pin out. I ended up having to bring it to my local Chevrolet dealer. One hour and fifteen minutes and $155.00 later, the new gear was installed. I still have to reinstall the headlight assembly back in the car. I swore up and down at GM for not doing a better job at designing the headlight motor assemblies to make it easier to repair. However when the C4 was being developed, I can understand that they might not have caught this issue if it wasn't starting to occur after 40,000 miles. So even though I may have been pissed I understand that during the development phase of a new car, not all problems can be found and addressed.
With the C7's digital dash...who knows. Maybe it will prove to be fail safe over time...and other issues might crop up like an inherent problem with rear hatch seals...or door locks...or anything else.
My point? At this stage of the game, don't criticize something that hasn't even hit production yet as what you think may be a total failure just might surprise you.
For those of you that have been posting about issues with your Vettes...be glad you don't own an Aston Martin with a bad transmission component. The replacement of the component could be cheap and fix the problem...but Aston will force you to fork over $29,000 for a brand new transmission....that just might have the same inherently bad component.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
You can't fault GM for the sneak peaks they're doing. Every automotive manufacturer does this. It helps build hype, and excitement. Personally, I think it's cool and I enjoy it. I want to be excited...ooohed..and ahhhed when they do finally pull the cover off. But that's just me.
I also don't mind the digital dash. From what I've seen so far, I really like it. I also see similarities to the digital dash that is now in the new generation SVT Viper which I love.
I have a 1990 ZR-1 which has a combination of digital and analog gauges. I don't mind it and after 45,000 miles, haven't had a problem with them. If I had to find a fault with them, it would have to be the tangerine color of them at night. However, not a deal breaker for me.
Every car has its commonly known issues. Its not just Corvette. Example: last weekend I had to pull out the left side headlight assembly to replace the gear in the popup headlight motor. In the early C4 years, GM used shitty plastic gears that disintegrated over time. In the later years they used stronger gears. It was an absolute bitch replacing this gear because of poor access/clearance to some of the bolts. Once I got the bolts out I couldn't get the final retaining pin out. I ended up having to bring it to my local Chevrolet dealer. One hour and fifteen minutes and $155.00 later, the new gear was installed. I still have to reinstall the headlight assembly back in the car. I swore up and down at GM for not doing a better job at designing the headlight motor assemblies to make it easier to repair. However when the C4 was being developed, I can understand that they might not have caught this issue if it wasn't starting to occur after 40,000 miles. So even though I may have been pissed I understand that during the development phase of a new car, not all problems can be found and addressed.
With the C7's digital dash...who knows. Maybe it will prove to be fail safe over time...and other issues might crop up like an inherent problem with rear hatch seals...or door locks...or anything else.
My point? At this stage of the game, don't criticize something that hasn't even hit production yet as what you think may be a total failure just might surprise you.
For those of you that have been posting about issues with your Vettes...be glad you don't own an Aston Martin with a bad transmission component. The replacement of the component could be cheap and fix the problem...but Aston will force you to fork over $29,000 for a brand new transmission....that just might have the same inherently bad component.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2