Money Pit....i would suggest you bypass all the gimmicks advertised by passport, escort, and the rest and get a Valentine 1....FRC
I'm always willing to learn something new, so perhaps you might be willing to enlighten us as to the "gimmicks" you are referencing.
In all of the independent testing I have been able to find, Escort 9500iX and Valentine One always test out pretty much the same on x/ka/k band & POP & Laser detection. I also notice that Valentine still refuses to discuss any independent testing other than the 2002 Car & Driver review which they did win. However, in the ensuing 10 years significant technological radar detection advances have been made yet Valentine continues to pretend it is still 2002. Wonder why?
I was trying to be nice above and keep the subject relatively neutral but since you desire to make strong allegations that there is only one "real" detector, the Valentine One, lets discuss the only three areas in which Valentine One and Escort 9500ix really seem to differ substantially.
First, on Valentine One's side of the balance sheet, it has bi-directional antennas that enable it to generally indicate whether the threat is ahead or behind whereas the Escort only indicates that a threat exists. That is somewhat nice to know, but almost all threats are visualized within two or three minutes anyway, and almost all are ahead, and no matter what threat direction is indicated, no one speeds for a few more miles after an alert unless the threat is aquired visually. To do otherwise is dangerous to one's wallet.
Second, on Escort 9500ix's side of the balance sheet are two of your "gimmicks" known as frequency filtering and GPS "filtering." Filtering is the ability of a unit to screen out false alerts. On that level, Valentine has always scored about 30% worse than all of the other top detectors on frequency filtering and offers no GPS filtering technology. But, perhaps there is some value in knowing that the numerous additional false alerts the Valentine One generates are ahead or behind?
It should also be pointed out that the Escort 9500ix warns me of many known radar traps in small town America and seems to pinpoint nearly all of the red light cameras in SoCal. Nice to know.
As far as filtering related GPS features, I backed up my Escort 9500ix last night and it has stored 127 false alert transmitters within a 18 mile radius of our home that will never again interupt our music, conversations, or just simple enjoyment of the sounds our C5 makes. Based on reviews concerning filtering ability, that means that there are probably about 150 false alerts in our immediate area that a Valentine One in my car would still be sounding on while the Escort remains silent.
Bottomline, GPS enabling has completely changed the game and it is the technology of the future that enables drivers to leave their radar detectors on all the time without constant false alerts spoiling the drive and tearing up the tires and brakes with constant over reaction to such false alerts. Also, because of this advanced frequency filtering and the GPS technology, it is possible to always leave the Escort at full power with no need to reduce sensitivity to "city" mode to minimize false alerts.
There are numerous testing articles covering "Valentine vs Escort" out there on the Internet. I have linked one that specifically addresses the issues of false alerts and GPS technology.
Best radar detector reviews from the world's most respected authority.
But, again, perhaps you have more recent independent testing data which indicates that Valentine One is truly superior to all these others.