I also think some of the market value has to do with the current crop of cars coming out new. (and those just a few years old).
If the downward trend of decreasing power and whatnot had continued, the earlier cars would have continued to increase in value, not much unlike the late C2's and early hi-perf C3's. Our cars were nearing the tail end of being strangled by government regulations.
Now, the new cars are at or above the power put out by the best vettes of the past. Since the new vettes and even the C5's really didn't go up in initial cost, their resale value is respectively lower. So now you have the issue of a low mileage '81 for say $16K or a equivalent mileage C5 for a reasonable couple of thousand more. Spec for spec, the C5 will crush the '81. So where's the incentive to pay big bucks to get your hands on an 'lesser' vette? The only real deciding factor there comes down to preferences of the physical appearance.
So unless there's a huge shift in what people like in terms of looks, I wouldn't expect a great leap in value for our cars. It's one of the reasons I don't care that my car isn't stock.
I got my car for me. I drive it for me. I'm not concerned about the value because "I might want to sell it in the future". Nah. And I have less than zero concern about what the next potential buyer might think because it's not stock. Hey, I didn't build my car for him. Did I buy it and keep it pristine so
he could enjoy it.
I enjoy
my car the way
I like it! Would you make payments on a car, store it in your garage, and maintain it for years and years just so someone else can pay to enjoy it later!?!? BAH! "I'm drivin' the ßitch!"
otfl
:L Sorry, got on a bit of a rant there. All that mumbo jumbo aside, the
only reason I care about the value of my car is for insurance purposes. If you don't have special insurance or "agreed value" and your car gets totaled, only getting blue book for it will make you cry. (Which is something I have yet to do!...get the car appraised and the insurance corrected.)