R
ROJO99
Guest
Eeeew... Of corse that what I said about the rear end view of the C5 when it first came out. Now I cant get enough of it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Andonis said:But the CTS was perfect from day one!!!!
Well almost, otherwise the CTS V wouldn't be born
I am SICK AND TIRED of the same design over and over again.
We live in the 21st century and the design should be LITTLE (at least) different than the others.
It's about gutts! BMW had gutts getting on flaming surfaces, even knowing that it may not be a success at all. But it HAD TO BE DONE!
Caddy was doin it when they FINALLY noticed that their old design is anachronistic, and they went on the Art and Science!
But so far ONLY two automakers did the RIGHT THING!
We need something NEW, something edgy, somethging provocative and elegant!!!! If CORVETTE claims to be the stars and stipes sporstcar, then why IS IT AFRAID???????????????
Or perhaps America wants to adopt an outwore design?????
It needs to be GENUINE!!!!!!!!!!!!! Not a crappy ferrari copy!!
Something stealthy....perhaps
I'm sorry didn't mean to offend anybody, I just got a little carried away
Sorry, but one way or the other this is IMHO.
ad :L
LongTimer said:You certainly have your right to your opinion - beauty is in the eye of the beholder. To these eyes and others I know the CTS looks like a Kleenex box that someone stepped on and then tried to pull back into shape. Folds and creases IMO are for paper airplains.
I hear you screaming for "DIFFERENT" (sorry if I'm wrong). Different too often ends up = FAD. I scream for FUTURE CLASSIC, like '57 and '67 are classic, but not a retro.