Welcome to the Corvette Forums at the Corvette Action Center!

Carb selection

greggome

Active member
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
38
Location
florida
Corvette
1968 corvette bronze coupe
Any opinions on a replacement carb for a 68' 327/350 stock spreadbore manifold? I have a 650 cfm holley double pumper on now. Its worked fine for years but its been giving me some issues. I am considering replacing it with either a new Holly double pumper spreadbore or a rebuilt quadrajet.
 
On a stock 327/350, I'd use either a Rochester Quadrajet or a vacuum secondary 650 Holley.
 
I find that the 600 CFM Edlebrock works very well in this application. You may need to change metering rods and/or jets to tune it to the engine.
 
greggome:
As you had a 650 CFM double pumper Holley for years; I'd stay with what you have.

Holleys can be rebuilt also; so why pay for a rebuilt Rochester?
 
greggome:
As you had a 650 CFM double pumper Holley for years; I'd stay with what you have.

Holleys can be rebuilt also; so why pay for a rebuilt Rochester?

+1 rebuild before you replace
 
+1 rebuild before you replace

Exactly and it's a lot less expensive than replacing..

AFA mechanical or vacuum secondaries, personally or back in the day of cheap leaded gas, I preferred the mechanical with dual shooters or accelerator pumps.. That being said, vacuum secondaries get better MPG and as they were vacuum contr
olled the same flow adapted well to a variety of engine sizes and requirements. The chief advantage of vacuum controlled secondaries is it's almost impossible to over-carburete an engine. Even with the softest diaphragm spring.. IMO, the British SU's variable slide operated by the engine vacuum and was one of the best.

Mechanical secondaries are a bit more complex to setup and double pumpers (2 accelerator pumps) were the usual. Typically, the secondaries would hit at ~40% of the primaries opening.. Without the dual pumpers, typically the engine would bog at low RPM.

To be honest, Hotrod.com says it better than I can..
"A mechanical-secondary carb’s enrichment characteristics are regulated by the accelerator-pump capacity, the accelerator-pump cam configuration, and (most important) the accelerator-pump nozzle-size (aka the pump “shooter” or “squirter”). All can be tailored to fine-tune the fuel curve, developing smooth linearity with no bog or hesitation in a performance motor. However, dialing in a double-pumper requires more effort and know-how than the more forgiving controlled secondary design. In summary, mechanical-secondary carbs are much more sensitive to engine size, drivetrain gearing, vehicle weight, and rpm range compared with the controlled secondary configuration, which is why the double-pumpers are offered in many more cfm ratings than the vacuum-secondary carbs."

In all honesty, with the cost of gasoline today, vacuum secondaries are probably the better choice. Unless, it isn't one's daily driver and all one wants is speed...








 
I haven't bought a new Holley in 10 years, the last being a 670 street avenger. I had to tune it out of the box but it works pretty good. I have heard recently they are another brand outsourced and the QC isn't the same. I can't back that up but I wouldn't be surprised. I ran a Q-Jet for years on my 69 & 72 and they worked better then the Holley's.
 
Where I used to work, a co-worker former employer was Demon. According to him, basically Demon cloned the Holley and fixed its well known short comings.
However, as I have no personal experience with the Demon carburetors; I don't know if they are worth pursuing or not. Perhaps, someone who does will weigh in....
 

Corvette Forums

Not a member of the Corvette Action Center?  Join now!  It's free!

Help support the Corvette Action Center!

Supporting Vendors

Dealers:

MacMulkin Chevrolet - The Second Largest Corvette Dealer in the Country!

Advertise with the Corvette Action Center!

Double Your Chances!

Our Partners

Back
Top Bottom