specs for alignment
I agree that specs for alignment should be determined.with some driver research..not on someone elses on line diatribe: I could be like toobroke and say I will give you specs next Saturday..or could give em now..but why listen to me..another ol blowhard..when one can look em up and decide..try Duntov and VBP sites and others as good specs differ not only from old factory, but from eachother now. I am happy with the specs I selected for my 81..and each car has its own suspension issues or not..upgrades over the years, or not..etc so a test drive will determine what seems best to you,.OK OK..for my 81 with new suspension poly bush, shocks, trail arms, bearings,...and tie rods set even, and steering not bent..good shape and adjusted, as is rear ride height set. This for advanced street-sport...and on an 81...done at a good shop, guy that does vettes so knows trail arm shims, and has laser computer align with print out. It took a few tries to bring it to spec.
Rear : do rear first: Camber .5 deg neg each side.
Rear toe in: 1/16 each side, so 1/8 total toe in.
Caster : 3.0-3.3 on right (as much as you can get on some cars), then .3 or so less on left so 2.7--3.0 on left, which allows for crown.
(on mine this was 3.3 and 2.9)
Front camber: .29 deg neg same both sides.
Front toe in: 1/16" per side, so 1/8" toe-in total of both sides.
See service manual for some important mfg tips on torque,order of tightening bolts, shims etc. So that worked for this car..no wandering, sticks and tracks like glued..straight and cornering, now Look up some specs for your car. These are NOT race track specs.
Nick