Barrier
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2001
- Messages
- 104
- Location
- Lido Beach,New York
- Corvette
- 1993 Convertible 1999 FRC Pewter sold
I am about to purchase new tires for my '99 FRC currently with original runflats. I was leaning toward the Kumho Ecsta SPTs, non runflats.
There has been discussion about the EMTs providing better mileage 3-4 mpg and better handling due to stiffer sidewalls in a Corvette Magazine.
I believe that the choice of Runflats on the C5 were based on lack of space for a spare and the room to put the Flat full size when it's changed, problems with spacesavers and limited slip differential, convienience and sexiness.
I have no problems with the usual arguments of Runflats vs Nonrunflats. I simply want to know if anybody has documentation (actual experience) with mileage and handling differences.
thanks in advance
Barrier
There has been discussion about the EMTs providing better mileage 3-4 mpg and better handling due to stiffer sidewalls in a Corvette Magazine.
I believe that the choice of Runflats on the C5 were based on lack of space for a spare and the room to put the Flat full size when it's changed, problems with spacesavers and limited slip differential, convienience and sexiness.
I have no problems with the usual arguments of Runflats vs Nonrunflats. I simply want to know if anybody has documentation (actual experience) with mileage and handling differences.
thanks in advance
Barrier