W
WNH
Guest
Thanks, I thought I bought the wrong filterEdmond said:Yep, that's what I saw for the Mobil 1. I just didn't feel good about a filter that is so much shorter! :ugh
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks, I thought I bought the wrong filterEdmond said:Yep, that's what I saw for the Mobil 1. I just didn't feel good about a filter that is so much shorter! :ugh
265 ci in 55 and 56 late 56 early 57 283. some cars got the 283 in 56 marked as a 265 because they ran out of the 265. These had a canister filter which was used till the late 60s. Not real sure anymore when they went to spin ons. I think my 69 chevelle had the canister.Ruby Fan said:I think the L98 is going to be at least 25 years old in '05. I have an '85 which has the L98. When you really think about it, it's going to be 50 years old based on the small block from '55. I think that was the 283 cid?
tnovot said:If money is no object, I would go with the Mobil 1. Although it has Champion internals, it has a really tough synthetic fiber filter element, which is the Champion’s only major downfall. The element is stronger and thicker than the Purolator, but they claim that it flows just as good as paper. As with the other low-end Wix filters, it has no internal sealing problems. The $10 price tag is a bit steep, but it is the best filter you can buy retail. Watch for “Mobil 1 Oil Change” sales, which includes 5 quarts of Mobil 1 synthetic oil and a Mobil 1 filter. Granted, there are probably better filters available through mail order, but I haven't tested those yet...
I reserve the right to change my opinion at any time. It could easily change if another filter (or one of the filters I am waiting on) comes around and is better.
If we're going back that far, you need to differentiate between 55 and 56 which had partial flow oil filters and 57 up with had full-flow. The filter for the latter is the PF141. That was used until 1967 when Chevrolet switched to spin-on filters.scav said:265 ci in 55 and 56 late 56 early 57 283. some cars got the 283 in 56 marked as a 265 because they ran out of the 265. These had a canister filter which was used till the late 60s. Not real sure anymore when they went to spin ons. I think my 69 chevelle had the canister.
PS the 55 265 may not have had a filter.?????
I use my ramps [homemade] and then jack it up an inch or 2 on the side the filter is on.slapshot said:While we're talking oil changes......how do you guys jack it up enough to get to the filter and oil drain plug????
Yes, AC, Wix, Purolator, and Mobil 1 came out with good scores from the oil filter study. Remember tho, it was done by one person. While everything sounded pretty scientific, it was not sponsored by any type of lab or testing agency. It did assign scores based upon area of filter media, type of anti-drain back valve, internal leakage, case construction, and several other factors.Chickenjerk said:So I am assuming based on cost, the prefered filter is the AC Delco, followed by the Wix. And the Mobil 1 is prefered overall if cost were not an issue? Being that said, my supply of Frams are going in the trash! Although, I have been using them for nearly 30 years without any problems, so they can't be all that bad. Hmmm?
I have two sets of ramps and cannot get onto either w/o using (2x4, or wider)stepper boards, which I place under the forward lip of each. This steps the front tires up, raising the spoiler, precluding the ramps scraping and deforming it.slapshot said:are the ramps low enough to fit under the front end?
This guy has a collection of about 45 very low milage vettes. He lives somewhere in Indiana, and has a whole building for his vettes... he only collects vettes. He also had a low mile 68 L88 like 6K miles on it at the show.Edmond said:Does he just occassionally drive out to his mailbox?
Did you see any good deals on parts at Vette' Fest?