Welcome to the Corvette Forums at the Corvette Action Center!

2014 engine

Len Imbrogno

Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2002
Messages
10
Location
ohio
Corvette
1988 COUPE
2014 Gen V engine announced!

GM just announced this morning the 2014 Gen V Corvette engine will be 6.2 liters @ 450 HP with 450 lb-ft torque, variable valve timing, 11.5:1 compression ratio, active fuel management and be designated the LT1.
 
Last edited:
? Link to press release ???
 
Valve layout?

Did they swap sides for valves? In the pics here for the engine specs the intake valves go from right to left on one and from left to right on the other..
 
Did they swap sides for valves? In the pics here for the engine specs the intake valves go from right to left on one and from left to right on the other..

Yeap!

They changed the intake and exhaust sides on the head.
 
They changed everything. I believe some nuts and bolts might be carried over.

The pictures of the individual engine parts are great.

I cannot wait to see final HP and torque numbers.
 
Thank God new engine doesn't have the dreadful "stop / start" feature that Mercedes-Benz (and others) are trying to pass-off on performance car buyers. Even some of the AMG cars have this feature.


My guess is that latent engine maintenance and reliability problems will also be surfacing down the road on stop / start technology. Bet the farm...
 
This may be ignorance on my part but what's the reference to "tri-lobe for fuel pump drive" on the camshaft mean? Is this a provision for the engine to be use w/ a mech. fuel pump?
 
This may be ignorance on my part but what's the reference to "tri-lobe for fuel pump drive" on the camshaft mean? Is this a provision for the engine to be use w/ a mech. fuel pump?

This is from the site NIKETALK:

New, tri-lobe camshaft: Compared to the Gen 4 Small Block, the camshaft remains in the same position relative to the crankshaft and is used with a new rear cam bearing, but it features an all-new "tri-lobe" designed lobe which exclusively drives the engine-mounted direct injection high-pressure fuel pump, which powers the direct-injection combustion system. The cam's specifications include 14mm/13.3mm (0.551/0.524-inch) intake/exhaust lift, 200/207-crank angle degrees intake/exhaust duration at 0.050-inch tappet lift and a 116.5-degree cam angle lobe separation.

You can see the whole article here:

Chevy Unveils the 2014 Corvette Engine: The LT1

:w
 
Should have thought of that but forgot about direct injection. Just like a diesel. :beer

Thanks for the link.
 
You are very welcome!

The LT1 engine will be operating at 150 BAR.

2175.56607 PSI

Yes, you read that right!

Over 2,100 pounds per square inch of pressure!

:w
 
That's only about 1/10th of the pressure that common rail Diesels utilize...

I'm a little surprised that they settled for variable cam phasing, rather than the system utilized in the Viper's engine, where the intake and exhaust lobes are variable independently from one another. Maybe we'll see that system employed on the "Z06" version of this engine...
 
Last edited:
I just finished looking at the great LT1 engine component photo link from Rob. Some observations:

The block still has liners (Whew!). Some have eliminated liners to reduce weight...and then regretted the decision in the long run.

The crank appears to have rolled fillets! And, can't tell for sure if that's a forging line or not...
The crank thrust bearing is at no. 3 position...hmmm

The piston crowns look very Diesel-esque. It's obvious that so much high-level design/engineering went into the combustion chamber/piston/injector geometry that it will be somewhere between "a long time" and "never" before the aftermarket will be able to improve on it. With this level of combustion control, I wouldn't be surprised if this engine would run fine on 87 octane fuel...how cool would that be?

The cam looks like a billet rather than a casting, possibly to alleviate HPFP-drive-induced torsional harmonics in the camshaft?

The HPFP appears to be a reciprocating design. No wonder they buried it in the valley, under the intake manifold, to quell the resulting noise.

The valve heads and stems appear to be welded together(?). Hollow stems, perhaps...

Aside from the combustion chamber design and I/E valve positions, the heads look quite similar to LS3 heads...

The exhaust manifolds look really good! I predict fewer header installations and more Extrude Honing...

The intake manifold plenum is now so ugly that they had to cover it up. That's too bad. There were already too many covers on the LS, and now it's even worse. The LT1 may be a great engine, but couldn't they have done a better job on it, cosmetically? In our Corvettes, we would prefer engines that look good to covers that look good, no?
 
Last edited:
Thank God new engine doesn't have the dreadful "stop / start" feature that Mercedes-Benz (and others) are trying to pass-off on performance car buyers. Even some of the AMG cars have this feature


Those stop start vehicles that are not hybrids better have some damned inexpensive starters to go with them (including labor), as they are probably going to be replaced frequently. :)
 
Interesting observation.

In this age of engine covers and shrouds, an engine that looks goos without artificial cosmetics would be refreshing.
 
In this age of engine covers and shrouds, an engine that looks goos without artificial cosmetics would be refreshing.

I wonder if a focus group at some point told them that modern engines are ugly or something. JMO, but even on a modern engine, I'd rather be able to see what's what than look at a stupid cover. Maybe they're using the covers for noise abatement?
 
I wonder if a focus group at some point told them that modern engines are ugly or something. JMO, but even on a modern engine, I'd rather be able to see what's what than look at a stupid cover. Maybe they're using the covers for noise abatement?



To a degree they are using them for noise abatement, but the biggest reason is cost. It is much cheaper to put a plastic cover over some seriously ugly engine parts (in any configuration they want) than it would be to engineer and design the engine externals for asthetics
 
But that's exactly the problem: what seems good to the engineers ("is cheap") registers bad with customers ("looks cheap")...
 

Corvette Forums

Not a member of the Corvette Action Center?  Join now!  It's free!

Help support the Corvette Action Center!

Supporting Vendors

Dealers:

MacMulkin Chevrolet - The Second Largest Corvette Dealer in the Country!

Advertise with the Corvette Action Center!

Double Your Chances!

Our Partners

Back
Top Bottom